Dice di si la corte del distretto nord della california, 7 novembre 2022, Case 3:22-cv-05415-TSH, Yuksel c. Twitter.
I danni lamentati dalla sospensione:
1. Sold me to a dictator who filed lawsuit against 36,066
dissidents, including me, in 2019 alone.
2. Suspended my account. Did not provide me with a specific
reason nor gave me chance to defend myself against the
unknown charge.
3. Destroyed all the intellectual content I had created in 7 years.
4. Cut my connections from more than 142,000 followers and
prominent contacts I had built and fostered in 7 years.
5. Harmed my public image and reputation since many of my
followers and readers thought I had blocked them
intentionally
Qui l’esenzione ex § 230 CDa si applica pianamente e la corte non manca di fare così.
Inoltre si premura di precisare che, anche non concordando con ciò , le domande (breach of conctract e altro) sarebbero rigettata nel merito lo stesso
(notizia e link alla sentenza dal blog del prof. Eric Goldman)